by Lynda Carson
Concerns are being raised by activists that some local Police Departments in Alameda County may be providing video tapes / DVDs to landlords and property owners that contain the images of the different types of renters, that the police believe the landlords should not be renting to.
According to sources, some of the images being presented to landlords by the police portray the mentally ill in a ridiculous and extremely offense manner, encouraging property owners to avoid renting to the mentally ill, and other renters being targeted by the police for displacement from their local communities. Stay tuned for more on this story, as more details become available.
As is, the police in Alameda County are working in partnership with landlords and property owners in an effort to transform neighborhoods into what are being called “crime free communities,” and have targeted some renters for displacement, especially those considered to be so-called “nuisance tenants” by the police, the Neighborhood Crime Prevention Council (NCPC), and the Rental Housing Association of Northern Alameda County (RHANAC).
In Oakland, the attacks on renters are so extreme that the Nuisance Eviction Ordinance (NEO) provides that the City will give access to police records and other evidence, that may be used to determine that the tenant/s should be evicted when the City orders the landlord to evict tenants from their housing for so-called nuisance activities. Landlords may face penalties and hefty fines if they do not evict tenants when ordered to do so by the City, under the Nuisance Eviction Ordinance.
Additionally, Police Departments around the country are currently implementing new programs to provide free criminal background checks on renters for local landlords and property owners, and the latest concerns being raised in the Bay Area about the police providing video tapes / DVDs telling landlords what kind of people they should not rent to, may be just the tip of the iceberg.
In brief, the archives related to California criminal background checks are being maintained by local law enforcement agencies, and often the police are very secretive regarding how the information is being used to assist landlords and property owners in screening prospective renters, but it appears to be widespread.
The partnership between the police and property owners across the nation are on-going, and the police are involved in many different programs being implemented to run criminal background checks on individuals, couples, workers, students, and families with children that are seeking rental housing.
Activists believe that these fascist police state programs are creating more homelessness for families, veterans, people on probation, low-income workers, the disabled, handicapped, elderly, parolees, mentally ill and the poor, in the Bay Area.
In some cities, hundreds of prospective tenants a year are being rounded up and landing in jail for petty offenses after signing a rental application, and a criminal background check was run on them as part of the process to rent a house, or an apartment. Some tenants are being rounded up for petty offenses, when landlords conduct surprise background checks on families that have already been renting from them for many years.
For instance, on July 1, 2011, in the City of Dubuque, Iowa, a new ordinance went into effect that requires landlords to run criminal background checks on everyone that fills out a rental application, and landlords that have ten rental units or more are now required to attend a city program about “crime free housing.” Landlords may face a fine, or lose their rental license if they do not comply with the ordinance.
The police have already offered landlords free background checks on renters during the past few years in Dubuque, but the program was not mandatory. The new law is mandatory and requires landlords and property owners to conduct background checks that search for any misdemeanor or felony charges, and convictions of renters, in the effort to make a so-called “safer community.”
In another example, as recent as late May of 2011, the Bettendorf Police Department announced that it has implemented a new free tenant screening program for landlords and rental property owners in Bettendorf, Iowa.
The Police Department’s program is called BLAST (Bettendorf Landlord Assistance Screening Tenants), that threatens the privacy rights of renters with the underhanded police state tactics being offered, in the effort to assist property owners and landlords in determining who shall, or who shall not reside in the local community.
Bettendorf’s population is around 33,200, and as of the census of 2,000, the racial makeup of the city was 95.01% white. The median income for men was $48,524, compared to only $28,564 for women in 2,000, and according to AreaVibes.com, currently 17.6 percent of the housing in Bettendorf is renter occupied.
To apply for the free tenant screening program (BLAST) being offered by the police, landlords and property owners in Bettendorf must fill out and submit a form, and provide social security numbers, the name/s and alias of the renter/s seeking housing, including the names of their children and dates of birth, plus the name and phone number of the renter’s employer. The landlords and property owners submit the forms to the Crime Prevention Unit, and the background investigations take around 5 business days to complete. The program is supposed to be voluntary, but it appears that the renters are not being asked to volunteer for the program, because this is a program for landlords and property owners.
The above mentioned programs being operated and maintained by the police are starting to spring up all across the country, in the effort to assist landlords and property owners in the creation of so-called “crime free communities.”
Additionally in California, the California Department of Justice offers an automated service for criminal history background checks that may be required in regards to employment, licensing and certification.
The police state programs are all being designed to determine who resides and works in our communities all across the nation, and have had a profound impact on all of those that are being negatively affected as a direct result.
Source: indybay
What safeguards are in place to ensure accuracy. If these are name and date of birth check what regulations are in place to allow a person to contest the findings if they have someone with the same name and date of birth as a felon? If we are talking local police checks that may be OK but if we are talking private national data broker checks I have a big problem with this. Having a felon with my same name and date of birth out there I wonder what would happen if I applied at one of these places. Its easy to clear up if given the chance. If we are going to mandate checks we need to mandate that people have recourse against inaccurate info or not their info. They should not have the right to send you away based on the results without and appeals process. My current complex found this other persons file and all I had to do was fax my drivers license in to clear it up. Would these landlords in these mandated places allow for such things or just the computer says no goodbye? I am not a criminal and don't deserve to be treated like one.
This would be very awesome for landlords, since this would safeguard them as well as their property. Its easy to clear up if given the chance. If we are going to mandate checks we need to mandate that people have recourse against inaccurate info or not their info. They should not have the right to send you away based on the results without and appeals process.